SKyra Legal is led by Adv. Snigdha Khandelwal, practising before the Supreme Court of India and High Courts, with a growing focus on personality rights, media law and emerging technology-related disputes.
A practice built around four commitments — carried through every matter, from a first consultation to final representation.
Advice framed around the client's broader objective, not just the immediate legal question.
Close attention to legislation, precedent and current legal developments before any position is taken.
Considered advocacy across complex disputes, tribunals and courts.
Working familiarity with technology, media and digital-identity issues shaping newer areas of law.
SKyra Legal advises individuals, businesses and public-facing clients across litigation, corporate advisory and specialised areas including personality rights and media law. The practice is built on the belief that strong representation begins with rigorous preparation.
Read about the firmA focused set of practice areas spanning litigation, advisory and the firm's specialist personality-rights work.
Image rights, publicity rights, unauthorised commercial use, digital impersonation.
View practice areaContractual disputes, recovery matters and complex civil proceedings.
View practice areaAdvisory and representation across media, entertainment and digital content matters.
View practice areaAs image, likeness and digital identity face new forms of exploitation — from unauthorised endorsements to AI-generated likeness — this is one of the fastest-evolving areas of Indian law. SKyra Legal approaches it with an educational, precedent-driven lens.
Explore this practice area
A running library of Indian judgments relevant to SKyra Legal's practice areas, each with a short analysis.
A nine-judge Constitution Bench unanimously held that the right to privacy is a fundamental right protected under Article 21 of the Constitution — the foundational judgment underpinning nearly every personality-rights and data-privacy claim that has followed in India.
Privacy & DefamationConstitutional LawOne of the earliest Indian rulings to articulate that publicity/personality rights vest in an individual and can be built through association with an event, and cannot be commercially appropriated by a third party without consent.
Personality RightsIntellectual Property RightsThe Delhi High Court restrained a jeweller from using an advertisement featuring Mr. Amitabh Bachchan and Mrs. Jaya Bachchan without consent, recognising both the endorsing company's contractual rights and the celebrities' independent personality rights.
Personality RightsMedia & Entertainment LawOriginal analysis from the SKyra Legal editorial desk.
The Delhi High Court's order in Anil Kapoor v. Simply Life India is India's clearest judicial statement yet that personality-rights protection extends to AI-generated impersonation — here's what that means in practice.
Read articleIndian courts have built personality-rights protection almost entirely through case law, not statute. Tracing that line — from ICC Development through Titan Industries to the recent AI-era rulings — shows where the doctrine is heading.
Read articleStandard endorsement agreements were drafted for photoshoots and appearances, not for a world where a voice or likeness can be synthetically generated. A practical look at what an AI-use clause should actually cover.
Read articleConversations on law, justice, rights and emerging legal issues. Episodes pending
Listen to episodesShort-form video on judgments, legal developments and practice-area explainers. Videos pending
Watch videosSubmitting an enquiry does not by itself create an advocate-client relationship. All enquiries are treated in confidence.
Make a Confidential Enquiry