Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors.

Privacy & DefamationConstitutional Law
Court: Supreme Court of India Date: 24 August 2017 Citation: (2017) 10 SCC 1 Bench: Nine-judge Constitution Bench

Background

The case arose out of a challenge to the Aadhaar scheme, which required the Court to first settle a threshold constitutional question: does the Indian Constitution guarantee a fundamental right to privacy at all?

Legal Issue

Whether the right to privacy is a fundamental right guaranteed under Part III of the Constitution of India.

Decision

The nine-judge Bench held unanimously that the right to privacy is a fundamental right, intrinsic to the right to life and personal liberty under Article 21 and as part of the freedoms guaranteed under Part III of the Constitution.

Ratio / Key Principle

Privacy is not a monolithic concept — it includes informational privacy, bodily autonomy and decisional autonomy, and any state (or private) intrusion must meet the tests of legality, necessity and proportionality.

Practical Significance

Every subsequent Indian ruling on personality rights, image rights and digital identity draws its constitutional foundation from this judgment.

Note — this entry is part of SKyra Legal's public legal research library and general commentary on Indian personality-rights jurisprudence. It does not imply that SKyra Legal represented any party in this matter.
Related Content
Practice Area

Personality Rights & Celebrity Law

View practice area
Article

Deepfakes and Personality Rights: What the Anil Kapoor Ruling Signals for India

Read article
Judgments

Browse the full library

View all judgments